The bipartition principle · Sleeve gastrectomy + transit bipartition
SASI joins a sleeve gastrectomy with an intestinal transit bipartition: it combines a restrictive, a malabsorptive, and a neuroendocrine/metabolic component in a single operation.
01 · What it is
SASI (Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal) combines a sleeve gastrectomy with a transit bipartition. I perform a conventional sleeve gastrectomy, removing approximately 75–80% of the stomach, and add a connection that lets part of the food reach the ileum earlier while another part keeps its normal path through the duodenum.
That early passage to the ileum activates intestinal hormones (GLP-1, PYY) that regulate hunger and glucose — the neuroendocrine component. The portion that continues through the duodenum and jejunum preserves absorption.
A single connection, versus two in a classic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). It combines the restrictive effect of the sleeve with an intestinal bypass component and a metabolic signal. The final indication depends on your clinical evaluation.
02 · Who it's for
It is a specific procedure that is not indicated for everyone; that is why we must assess your case first. SASI may be considered in selected patients with BMI ≥40, or BMI ≥35 when comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, or high triglycerides are present.
Obesity with BMI ≥40, with or without associated metabolic disease.
BMI ≥35 accompanied by conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, or high triglycerides.
The final indication depends on your full clinical evaluation and a detailed informed consent, which we review in consultation before deciding.
If your case calls for robust 10+ year evidence — for example, long-evolution type 2 diabetes — an established option like gastric bypass or sleeve may suit you better. We define that together in consultation, before deciding.
03 · The procedure
Cardiology and anesthesia evaluation, nutritional assessment with a clinical nutritionist, psychological evaluation with bariatric psychology, and a detailed informed consent reviewing the procedure, its scope, and the available evidence.
Laparoscopic operation under general anesthesia. Resection of 75–80% of the stomach in vertical sleeve, followed by creation of a single side-to-side anastomosis between the gastric antrum and a loop of ileum. Approximate operative time: 90–120 minutes.
1–2 nights in hospital. Early ambulation within 24 hours. Start of clear-liquid diet under supervision. Daily medical visit until discharge.
If you're from outside Cancún, 3 additional days are recommended before flying home. Hotel near the hospital, WhatsApp follow-up and fluid monitoring.
Typical progression: clear liquids → full liquids → puree → soft solids over approximately 6 weeks. Nutritional support throughout the transition.
In-person or virtual visits at month 1, 3, 6, and 12, then annually. Because long-term evidence is still being built, nutritional and outcome monitoring matters more, not less.
04 · Outcomes
SASI has shown favorable short-term results. Its main current limitation is that there are still few studies with medium- and long-term follow-up, especially beyond 5 years and in large patient groups. For that reason, IFSO considers it an innovative/investigational procedure that should be evaluated carefully, with individual assessment, detailed informed consent, and close follow-up.
Range reported in published case series (Mahdy et al. International Journal of Surgery 2016; Emile et al. systematic review, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2024).
Early case series report high remission rates, but sample sizes are small and follow-up is limited. We do not commit to a specific percentage until evidence matures.
There are still few studies with follow-up beyond 5 years and in large patient groups. That is why long-term nutritional and outcome monitoring matters more, not less.
Sources: Mahdy et al. (International Journal of Surgery 2016, original SASI description); Emile et al. (Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2024, systematic review); Brown et al., Innovative Bariatric Procedures and Ethics in Bariatric Surgery: the IFSO Position Statement, Obesity Surgery 2022.
05 · Benefits
When SASI is the right option — and we decide that together in consultation — it can offer concrete advantages. I am not saying it is "better" than other techniques: in the right patient, it adds useful features.
One surgical join, instead of the two in techniques like the classic bypass (RYGB). When clinically appropriate, it can be a simpler procedure.
Combines the restrictive component of the sleeve with an intestinal and neuroendocrine/metabolic effect.
Keeps the route for endoscopic inspection of the duodenum and biliary tree, unlike techniques that exclude it.
The gastro-ileal anastomosis can be reversible if the case requires it.
None of these advantages replaces careful patient selection or detailed informed consent. Evidence beyond 5 years in large cohorts is still limited compared with bypass (RYGB) or sleeve, and the final indication depends on your clinical evaluation.
06 · Cost
Each case has a different risk profile, hospital choice, length of stay, and follow-up program. Publishing a single number would be dishonest — it would either undersell complex cases or overprice simple ones.
WhatsApp me your weight, height, and any medical conditions. I respond within 24 hours with a real quote, hospital recommendation, and financing options if you need them.
07 · SASI vs Bypass
08 · Frequently asked
Next step
WhatsApp me your weight, height, and any medical conditions. I respond personally with an honest assessment — including whether an alternative with more evidence (RYGB or sleeve) would be more appropriate for your case.
Reply within 1 hour · 24/7